I came across this one a while ago, but it’s always just sort of stuck with me. I found the discourse around it fascinating, though I disagreed vehemently with the position that was being put forth. Now, what’s the controversy? Well, if you, as a reader decide to DNF a book and you give it a rating based on what you read and that decision in itself, is it wrong?

what foxI’ve heard on many different occasions that it’s deeply unfair of readers to rate a book they chose not to finish and while I certainly understand an author’s perspective here as I can only imagine that it feels deeply upsetting and unfair to have someone rate their book without considering all the pieces of it, and yet I still found myself somewhat appalled at the notion.

fox3And I get it, I really do. I’m a writer as well. I don’t respond well to criticism initially of things that I have written, especially in the instance that I feel a person has misjudged based on lack of information. But again, I disagree with this stance that readers who may have spent money and certainly spent time reading a book, shouldn’t rate said book if they have to discontinue reading it at some point for whatever reason.

My logic for this is simple. Whether or not a reader has finished the book, the reader obviously had a reason to make the decision to put it aside. And whatever that decision was will clearly influence the reader’s opinion of the book. Whether they put it down because the writing quality was bad or because the plot had some holes or simply because the topic was problematic or extremely sensitive, I feel that readers have a right to review the portion of the book that they did read.

I think most readers understand when they see the label DNF on a review for a book that there are obviously some things that the reviewer is not going to know or be able to reference in their review. Readers are not dumb and they can sleuth out for themselves what that DNF rating means. Additionally, if a reviewer chooses to DNF a book, they have put time and effort into reading something that disappointed them and as such have every reason to show that in their rating or their review.

A DNF rating is not considering the entirety of a book, no, and that is a fair criticism of the rating itself. But I do believe that readers are capable of fully understanding that a DNF rating does not reflect the book in its whole and will take that into consideration when deciding whether or not to read the book. I’m sure not everyone does this, of course, but there are likely a large number of people who do.

fox1And finally, if a reader chooses to DNF a book, their reason for doing so is a valid one. They might point to something problematic about the book, they might point to errors that were made, they might point to plot holes or lack of realism in characters. And it’s important to recognize these things and their role in prompting the reader to put the book down rather than to grow angry with them for giving a book the critique that they did.

I imagine I will cite this often when bringing up review controversies, but I always think back to Fifty Shades of Grey when this sort of thing comes up. I rated this book one star. I marked the book as DNF at about 70% because I just couldn’t stand the disgusting abusive relationship and the absolutely terrible writing. The mistakes were all over the place, the plot holes were numerous, the characters made no sense, and the relationship was the most abusive I’ve ever seen in literature while masquerading itself as romantic when it was everything but. I was deeply uncomfortable with a great deal of things in this disgrace of a novel and I had to put it down.

And there is absolutely nothing that makes me believe, currently, that this book did not deserve that one-star review. In fact, if I could have given it negative stars, I would have. For many reasons. And so the very notion that, because I did not finish reading a book that was, by all accounts, the worst book I’d ever had the misfortune to come across, I shouldn’t have rated it to reflect those feelings is rather ridiculous to me. The book was deeply problematic, there were so many errors, and it was incredibly unrealistic. It deserved the one-star rating based on what I was able to force myself through, for the time and energy I spent on it.

fox2I would never rate a book that I have not read, which is why I have not rated this book’s subsequent sequels, though my understanding of them is that they are just as bad as the first, if not worse. But I spent time with this first novel and therefore had every reason to give it a rating, even though I did not read the book to the end. There are legitimate and strong reasons for the rating I chose to give the book, as I’m sure there are for other readers who have rated books they marked as DNF and the idea that I should not have rated it is, frankly, quite ridiculous.

While I acknowledge that it is not a fun thing to have someone put a book you may have written aside for their own reasons and rate it poorly as a result, I think there’s something to be taken from the fact that this happened in the first place. And I hope that when I publish something, if someone makes the decision to discontinue reading and gives the book a low rating, I deeply consider their reasons for having done so and whether or not there is something I need to improve on in my writing. And I might agree or disagree with the reader’s review and opinion, but at the end of the day they spent time reading a book and were honest about how they felt. And I don’t think anyone can reasonably fault them for that.

So, with all of that, I leave you. Though this discussion was pretty in depth, I hope the fox gifs were a welcome break in between. Thanks for sticking around and feel free to leave your own opinion in the comments below about this particular topic! This post details my personal opinion on the matter and I do not expect everyone to share it with me, so feel free to disagree and let me know why if you do! I’d love to read your reasoning as I always like to expand my opinion with knowledge and understanding from others.

As always, happy reading!

| Goodreads | Twitter | Instagram | Book Club Reviews |


7 thoughts on “Review Controversies and My Stance on the Matter [Part Two – When You DNF a Book]

  1. Great Post! And I love the fox gifs 😍 50 Shades is a great example. It made me completely uncomfortable too. I find that a lot of people either love the book or DNF it. So to get both sides of the story then the DNF peeps need to leave reviews too. That way people considering buying the book can make an informed decision.

    Before starting blogging I rarely didn’t finish books. I hated not finishing books. But since blogging I have come to realize that DNFing can actually be a good thing, and it has been an awesome realization!

    Liked by 1 person

  2. I really agree with you here! Firstly, if I see a DNF rating, I’ll know that it’s not a reflection on the book as a whole necessarily. However, I also think that it’s totally fair for someone to DNF if they realise they just can’t get through the rest of it (fifty shades is a good example for that- and I finished the book and still gave it 1 star- it wouldn’t have made a difference if I hadn’t though). Great post!

    Liked by 1 person

  3. i LOVE this post! I am a big advocate of DNF, as i think there are too many good books out there to waste time on one i’m not enjoying. Usually if I’ve read more than 25-50 pages, I’ll rate it. Sometimes I can tell from the first few pages that it isn’t going to be for me, and in that case I don’t rate, but I still DNF it that early in.

    Liked by 1 person

  4. I still rate books I DNF. I understand the objections, but I’m rating it based on what I read (assuming it’s more than a chapter or two). I’m not rating it for other people anyway, I’m rating it for myself. I’m pleased if others enjoy my review, but they are my opinions. That doesn’t mean someone else might not enjoy the book. But like you say, I had reasons for not finishing it in the first place.

    Liked by 1 person

  5. First I love the fox GIF. Second when I did not finish a book (unusual but it may happen) I did not rate it but explained why I DNF and who might love the book (usually there is always someone except if the author did a very crappy job). I never lie. But I am always respectful.

    Liked by 1 person

  6. It’s a difficult situation!
    I just recently DNFd a book I got via netgally. I wanted to write a review (or reason for DNF to be precise) but Netgalley won’t let you submit it without star ratings…

    I also think, that sometimes these situations are not necessarily the author’s fault. Like the book I dnfd was not written that badly. Like yea, there were conversations that just made no sense and i had no idea who was talking… but what made me dnf, was that it was not what i expected. The synopsis clearly said it’s a suspenseful story. It was not. The synopsis was most likely written by the publisher with a certain marketing strategy in mind.

    Also, the title was misleading. The book was called My Husband’s Secret. So of course i imagined it will be written in the first person (at least for one character) and it will be quite intimate. Even the blurb made it sound like that’s the case. And it wasn’t. Like literally, there were more pressing issues up to 30% than that husband.

    So i rated it as a 2. But it was because the description didn’t match the story and if i knew what it was about i wouldn’t have read it because i don’t care for those type of stories…

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s